HAZOP Methodology and Techniques - Process Industry
Introduction
The main objective of the HAZOP session is to:
- Check that any deviation in design parameters will not cause hazards to people environment and/or assets, or company reputation.
- Check whether the precautions incorporated in the design are sufficient to either prevent the hazard from occurring or reduce any consequence to an acceptable level.
- Consider any safety interfaces, which exist with other installations.
- Ensure the plant can be started up, operated, maintained, and shut down safely
HAZOP Terminologies
Abbreviation and Description
HAZOP
The application of a formal systematic critical
examination to the process and engineering intentions of new or existing
facilities. Potential for mal-operation or malfunction of individual items of
equipment are assessed and recommendations for mitigation measures are stated.
NODE/SYSTEM
A defined section of the process plant, general facilities,
storage and handling, utilities, other services, and off-sites are to be examined
DESIGN INTENT
The way the process and equipment are intended to work
under both normal and anticipated abnormal conditions.
HAZARD
Defined as a deviation having the potential to cause
damage, illness, injury or other form of loss.
GUIDE WORD
A departure from the design and operating intention.
DEVIATION
A departure from the design and operating intention.
CONSEQUENCE
A result of a deviation.
SAFEGUARD
Physical or procedural measures are incorporated to eliminate
or reduce the likelihood of a hazard occurring.
HAZOP Methodology
The method consists of a systematic study of all process
and utility lines along with the equipment included in the project. The study
is performed primarily on the P&IDs, which have been released for HAZOP
Review.
The first step in applying the HAZOP study technique is to select an element of the system, i.e., a line, vessel, or procedural step. The function of this element should be described by the process design specialist in the team. For each element, the study investigates the appropriate process parameters and guidewords to develop deviations from the design intent.
The list of guidewords appropriate to the system being studied is presented by the chairman and agreed upon by the team at the start of the study. Once agreed this list is then normally
applied to all process elements. Where several systems
are being reviewed, then the team may wish to tailor the list of guidewords for one
or more of the systems, particularly if batch operations are involved.
For each keyword, the HAZOP team lists the possible causes and the consequences regarding the operating procedures and the safety aspects from both a personnel and material point of view.
The next step is to judge whether the engineering and safety systems as presented in the P&IDs and other engineering information can cope with the consequences of all deviations.
If the team judges that the engineering and safety systems are unlikely to cope with the consequences of all deviations, or an operability feature requires attention, then a recommendation is made. The responsible party for each identified action/recommendation is identified.
Recording of the HAZOP session is done utilizing Excel
worksheets and ranking of the risk as per general Risk Matrix is performed.
HAZOP Study Techniques
A HAZOP study progresses through the plant node by node.
The selection of the node sizes and the route through the plant is made before
the study by the HAZOP Chairman.
Nodes
The division of the plant into appropriately sized nodes
containing process lines and/or equipment is made by the Chairman before the
study.
The guidelines to be followed are based on changing nodes
at a major piece of equipment or
where a critical parameter (flow, pressure, temperature)
changes.
The objective is to focus on appropriately sized sections of the plant for the team to be able to clearly identify all the design and operation issues.
The node intention defines how the process is expected to perform and it should be recorded for all plant operating cases. It is important to give the full range of operating and design conditions.
Deviations
Deviations are the key to the HAZOP process.
Potential deviations to the design intention are generated by considering a series of guidewords and combining them with the parameters of operation. In some cases, the parameter and guide word when combined make a well-understood deviation, e.g., less flow. In other cases, explanations may need to be developed for the deviation, e.g., as well as flow may more easily be described as an additional component, and part of flow arises when an element of the flow composition is missing.
Causes
There may be many causes identified for each deviation,
and all potential causes should be
discussed, as the consequences and recommendations for action
may be different.
All the potential causes of the deviation should be identified by the team brainstorming. The Scribe will record each separate cause as it is identified by creating new rows on the worksheet.
Generally, causes will fall into one of three categories:
- Human error
- Equipment failure
- External events.
Consequences
The role of HAZOP is to determine the net effect of the
potential consequences and the mitigating effect of all the protective
measures.
Having identified the credible causes of the deviation,
the team members should analysis and
assess the significance of the consequences.
The consequences can be inside or outside the node being
studied.
It is not considered good practice to identify a
deviation therefore e.g., if a cause could result in a high pressure, the
consequence should be recorded as potential overpressure resulting in vessel
rupture, not high pressure.
The consequences of the deviation must be assessed and
recorded without controls (safeguards).
Controls (Safeguards)
The team must identify all the existing safeguards that
are available. The Team shall discuss and agree on the effectiveness of the
safeguard in preventing the consequences from happening.
HAZOP Guidewords and Parameters
List of Guidewords
Guide Word Definition
HIGH (more of, higher)
Does more than is specified or required quantitative
increase (e.g., opens a valve fully, when the procedure calls for “cracking” the valve)
LOW/NO (less of, lower)
Does less than is specified or requires quantitative
decrease (e.g., purges a vessel for 5 minutes when the procedure calls for 10
minutes)
MISDIRECTED
Fluid is flowing to a path other than the design intent
path
List of Deviations
LOW/NO Flow
Valve closed, wrong routing, blockage, blind flange left in, faulty non-return valve, filter blinded, burst pipe, airlock, failure of trace heating, water contamination in line freezes, flow transmitter/control valve malfunctions, pump or vessel failure, Partial blockage, vessel or valves failing, leaks, loss of pump efficiency.
HIGH Flow
Control valve sticking open, flow
controller malfunction, more than 1 pump operating, reduction in delivery head
required, increased suction pressure, other routes, exchanger tube leaks.
MISDIRECTED FLOW
High pressure downstream/low pressure
upstream, wrong routing, burst pipe, valve failure, emergency venting, pump, or
vessel failure.
LOW Pressure
Pressure control malfunction. RV
relieves and fails to reseat. Pump-out rate exceeds the capacity of the vessel vent. The vessel vent is blocked when emptying. Cooling in the vessel allows vapor to condense.
Blocked pump or compressor suction lines.
HIGH Pressure
Pressure Surge, relief, leakage from
HP connection, solar radiation on blocked-in line/vessel, pressure control
malfunction, level control malfunction allows high-pressure gas breakthrough,
inadequate venting of air/vapor when filling.
LOW Temperature
Lower than expected ambient
temperature/freezing, loss of pressure, loss of heating (including trace
heating), failed exchanger tubes, temperature controller failure, pressure
relief, and cooling.
HIGH Temperature
Temperature control malfunction, solar
radiation, high ambient temps, fouled cooler tubes, cooling water failure,
failed exchanger tubes
HIGH Level
Level control malfunction, control
valve sticking shut, flow into vessel exceeds outflow capacity, flow impeded
downstream.
LOW Level
Level control malfunction, control
valve sticking open, drain valve passing.
0 Comments